Stock Groups

Fed Leaves Markets Guessing about Tapering By TipRanks

[ad_1]

© Reuters. FOMC Meeting: Fed Leaves Markets Guessing about Tapering

The Fed is expected to begin tapering soon, according to a statement issued following the September FOMC meeting. However, it didn’t provide a time frame for what that means, leaving markets guessing once again.

What the Fed offered was an assessment of economic activity overall and the financial environment. “With progress on vaccinations and strong policy support, indicators of economic activity and employment have continued to strengthen,” said the FOMC statement.

The statement continued, “The sectors most adversely affected by the pandemic have improved in recent months, but the rise in COVID-19 cases has slowed their recovery. The elevated inflation is largely due to transitory issues. Overall financial conditions remain accommodative, in part reflecting policy measures to support the economy and the flow of credit to U.S. households and businesses.”

Meanwhile, the Fed reiterated that the pace of the economic recovery depends on the speed of the pandemic. “The path of the economy continues to depend on the course of the virus, ”the FOMC statement said. “Progress on vaccinations will likely continue to reduce the effects of the public health crisis on the economy, but risks to the economic outlook remain.”

Simply put, the virus will set the pace of monetary policy for months to come.

Do you have a dual mandate?

What about the Fed’s dual mandate of maximum employment and stable prices? Is the economy close to achieving these goals?

Again, the Fed did not provide any details. “The Committee seeks to achieve maximum employment and inflation at the rate of 2 percent over the longer run,” said the FOMC statement.

“With inflation having run persistently below this longer-run goal, the Committee will aim to achieve inflation moderately above 2 percent for some time so that inflation averages 2 percent over time and longer term inflation expectations remain well anchored at 2 percent. The Committee expects to maintain an accommodative stance of monetary policy until these outcomes are achieved.”

Simply put, the Fed is targeting average inflation rather than absolute inflation. It’s willing to tolerate inflation above 2 percent for quite some time to make it up for inflation below 2 percent in the previous year.

The Fed may be trying to prevent Japanese-style inflation. The Fed can now focus its efforts on maximum employment, and not fighting inflation, as this is no priority. Yet, as has been the case in its previous statements, the Fed has avoided defining what maximum employment is, reiterating the view that maximum employment depends on “several conditions” and that unemployment remains elevated for “certain groups.”

Bottom Line

The Fed’s view that the economy has yet to reach maximum employment seems to be in sharp contrast with what’s happening in the real world, where company after company has a hard time finding workers to do the job. For instance, this week, Lennar (NYSE:), D.R. FedEx (NYSE :), Horton (DHI) and FedEx (NYSE 🙂 all cited the negative effects of labor shortages on their business.

Apparently, either the Fed’s easy monetary policy isn’t working, or its view of maximum employment is flawed.

Disclosure: Panos Mourdoukoutas held a FedEx position at the time this article was published.

Disclaimer: This article is written solely by the author and does not reflect the opinions of Tipranks and its affiliates. It should only be used for informational purposes. Tipranks cannot guarantee the reliability, completeness or accuracy of any information. The article does not constitute a solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell securities. This article is not intended to provide advice on legal, financial and investment matters. Tipranks, its affiliates, disclaim any liability or responsibility in relation to the content. You are responsible for your actions based upon the articles. Tipranks and its affiliates do not endorse or recommend this link. Performance in the past is no guarantee of future performance, price or results.



[ad_2]