Facebook files to dismiss FTC lawsuit again, says Khan should have recused
After meeting with Irish politicians, Mark Zuckerberg (Facebook Chief Executive Officer) and Mark Zuckerberg were taken to the Merrion Hotel, Dublin. They discussed regulation of social media and transparency in political advertising. In Dublin, Ireland, Tuesday April 2, 2019.
Artur Widak | NurPhoto | Getty Images
FacebookMonday’s second motion was filed to disqualify the Federal Trade Commission lawsuit. It claimed that the vote of the agency to amend the complaint was invalid, as Chair Lina Khan had to withdraw herself.
FTC filed an amended complaintA federal judge threw out the agency’s initial claims. However, the judge gave FTC another chance to support its claim that Facebook had violated antitrust laws by unlawfully maintaining monopoly powers.
Facebook, however, had filed a complaint prior to the FTC filing an amended complaint. petition for recusalKhan argued that Khan’s past statements had shown she was already certain of its liability.
According to the press release that was included with the amended complaint, the FTC stated it had dismissed the petition because its Office of General Counsel had “carefully examined” the matter. Since the case will be heard before a federal court, the FTC decided to provide the necessary constitutional due process protections for the company.
Facebook now asks the court this question, accusing Khan of participating in the House Judiciary subcommittee on antitrust report about competition digital markets“At the most, creates the impression that the Chair has prejudged facts and cannot impartially or impartial.”
Facebook claimed Khan’s participation to the 3-2 vote on the amended complaint in its motion for dismissal “violates both federal ethics and basic due-process safeguards.”
Khan told the Senate during her confirmation hearing, that she does not believe that Khan has financial conflicts that could require her to recuse herself under the ethics laws. And antitrust experts sayCourts tend to consider the question of recusal less important when a commissioner decides to bring a case to federal court rather than acting under agency internal administrative law proceedings.
Facebook filed a statement stating that, despite the fact that it was asked to recuse itself from the matter of the FTC’s support for its claim that Facebook holds the monopoly in the “personal social networking service market”, which the FTC defined as that company. Facebook says the FTC “cherry-picked data” from three apps: Snapchat, Instagram, Snapchat and Facebook in order to “support” its supercharged market share numbers. It also claims that it has failed to demonstrate that WhatsApp and Instagram were acquired by exclusionary conduct.
Although the stock of the company was lower than 5% Monday, many other peers were down around 3%. The stock fell more than 5% on Monday, but several of its peers were also down about 3% that day. several Facebook services experienced technical outagesAnd the day before. a Facebook whistleblower revealed her identity in a TV interviewBefore her appearance before the Senate panel.
FTC spokeswoman declined to comment.