Stock Groups

G20 urged to drive better environmental, social investing practices By Reuters

[ad_1]

© Reuters. FILEPHOTO: The cooling towers of Lethabo Thermal Power Station are visible in front the electricity pylons. It is an Eskom co-burning power source located near Sasolburg in northern Free State. March 2, 2016. REUTERS/Siphiwe Sibeko/File Photo/File Photo

By Simon Jessop

LONDON, (Reuters) – The world’s largest economies must do more to improve their environmental and social governance ratings. This is according to a Monday report by the OECD.

The report was released ahead of the October G20 meeting. It stated that while ESG criteria investment could be a good way to help the international climate goals, there were “considerable challenges.”

The report highlighted, in particular, that there are many approaches for assessing ESG issues and inconsistent data. There is also a dearth of comparisons between ESG rating methods.

The report stated that “These competing dynamics, challenges, and ESG ratings and investing could compromise the market integrity, erode investors confidence and mask the extent to which investment decisions have environmental and climate-related consequences.”

“Ultimately, the challenges may limit the pace of capital allocation required to realize tangible progress towards long-term value support and a transition into low-carbon economies.”

This report comes after the International Organization of Securities Commissions opened a consultation on ESG rating ratings in July. It also precedes the next round of international climate negotiations in November.

The OECD urged governments to guarantee global transparency, comparability, and quality in core ESG metrics.

The report stated that ratings agencies seemed to give less importance to negative environmental impact and place more emphasis on the disclosure by companies of their policies and goals, without assessing their effect.

Rating agencies often use a lot of sub-category score to help them. The OECD demanded more clarity about the meaning of these scores in order to make it easier for investors.

The lack of data and policy clarity on carbon pricing, support for renewables and investments was also preventing investors from making their plans.

Globally, more international cooperation is required to make sure that ESG-related practices and climate-transition-related practices are progressed in a way that reduces market fragmentation and increases investor confidence.

Disclaimer Fusion MediaThis website does not provide accurate and current data. CFDs include stocks, indexes and futures. Prices are provided not by the exchanges. Market makers provide them. Therefore, prices can be inaccurate and differ from actual market prices. These prices should not be used for trading. Fusion Media does not accept any liability for trade losses that you may incur due to the use of these data.

Fusion MediaFusion Media or any other person involved in the website will not be held responsible for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on this information, including charts, buy/sell signals, and data. Trading the financial markets is one of most risky investment options. Please make sure you are fully aware about the costs and risks involved.



[ad_2]