Stock Groups

The Fed is about to see a lot of new faces. What it means for banks, the economy and markets

[ad_1]

Sarah Bloom Raskin

Andrew Harrer | Bloomberg | Getty Images

It will take just months for the Federal Reserve to look significantly different.

While the upper echelon of an institution may be subject to some changes, it could still look the same.

Fed-watchers believe that there will not be much ideological change, even though Sarah Bloom Raskin and Lisa Cook are confirmed to the Board of Governors. White House sources claim President Joe Biden will. nominate the trioThe next few days.

Raskin seems to be the greatest change agent of all three. As vice chair of bank supervision until December, she is expected to have a more imposing role. Prior to that, Randal Quarles had a much lighter hand.

It will surprise the bankers that the rhetoric might seem a touch more extreme. The substance is what? But what are these men doing?

Christopher Whalen

Whalen Global Advisors founder

Raskin might be more vocal about the financial system than others, but there is still a question as to how that will actually translate into policy.

She is a former regulator. She is an expert in this field. Christopher Whalen (founder of Whalen Global Advisors) said, “This isn’t something she’s going to mess up.” He was a former Fed researcher. “The bankers are going to be shocked that the rhetoric might be a little more extreme. What about the substance? But what are these men doing? “They don’t seem to take many chances.”

Since 2008’s financial crisis, U.S. banks have been holding more high-quality capital than risk assets. It went from 11.4% in 2009 to 15.7% by the third quarter of 2011. according to Fed data.

The banking industry remains a favourite target for congressional Democrats led by Massachusetts Senator. Elizabeth WarrenHis preference is said to be Raskin’s for the supervisory role.

But the nomination’s greatest impact may be in the places that the Fed hadn’t been as active recently. For example, the effort to encourage banks to consider the potential financial impacts of climate-related changes.

Krishna Guha is the head of Evercore ISI’s central bank strategy and global policy.

Guha believes Raskin is “adopting an materially stronger line on regulation than Quarles”, but he sees her being pragmatic on issues like reform in the Treasury Market, particularly pandemic-era adjustments to the Supplementary Loan Ratio. SLR is the standard for weighing assets that banks have, so industry leaders are calling for changes to distinguish between Treasurys and more risky holdings.

In the aftermath of the pandemic, the financial system has seen unusual trends, including a significantly higher liquidity demand due to the Fed’s overnight repo agreements. These allow banks to exchange cash for high-quality assets. With nearly $2 trillion being exchanged, this was a new record for New Year’s Eve 2020. On Thursday, there were more than $1.6 billion in transactions.

There are many challenges in monetary policy

Raskin will need to pay attention to these and other issues as well as wider questions about monetary policies.

Cook and Jefferson will likely bring dovish perspectives to the board. This would mean they support looser policies on interest rates. However, if confirmed they will be joining the board at a moment when the Fed is moving toward a more conservative approach. teeing up rate hikesInflation control measures that include tightening the belt.

Guha stated that it was a mistake for them to be seen as likely to form an extreme dovish bloc upon their arrival, and to oppose the Fed’s hawkish shift. “Rather, we think they – like [Governor Lael]Brainard, and other once-famous doves [Mary]Daly [Charles] Evans – will view policy as a game of two halves and explain what this means and how it may play out.”

Evans heads the Chicago central bank operation while Daly is president of San Francisco Fed.

They have spoken out, along with many other policymakers, about raising rates. Even if they did come in to tighten policy, the desire to reduce price rises would likely drown them out. at their highest rate in nearly 40 years. In March, the Fed is also expected to stop buying monthly assets.

The area where the Fed seems to be less determined is in reducing the assets it holds, which is more than $8.8 trillion. At the December meeting, some officials stated that balance sheet reduction could startSome people have expressed doubt about the rate rises in the days since they were announced.

People want the Fed do something to curb inflation. However, as the growth slows around spring, the people won’t be willing to take on higher borrowing costs,” stated Joseph LaVorgna (chief economist for Americas at Natixis) and former president Donald Trump.

He said, “They are going to be quite dovish regarding the rates side and may actually push back against the balance sheet reduction.”

Brainard is likely to take over the role of vice chair at the Federal Open Market Committee. This committee sets the interest rate policy. This position makes her chairman Jerome Powell’s top lieutenant. Statements during Thursday’s Senate confirmation hearing indicate that she will likely be voted in.

After Robert Kaplan, the Dallas regional president and Eric Rosengren of Boston resigned in last year’s controversy about market trades made by Fed officials at the beginning of the pandemic, there are now two open positions.

Whalen, an ex-Fed official, stated that while they will be busy, new policymakers won’t push for large scale changes.

He stated that Fed governors might spend more time in this year discussing the nuts and bolts financial markets. It’s clear that they made errors. They’re still not good at this.”

[ad_2]