Stock Groups

Gap settles U.S. charges of job discrimination based on immigration status -Breaking

[ad_1]

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO – The Gap logo can be seen at the entrance of the store located on Oxford Street, London, Britain. July 1, 2021. REUTERS/John Sibley

Jonathan Stempel

(Reuters) – Gap Inc (NYSE 🙂 settled federal charges alleging that the company routinely discriminated against U.S. citizens based on their immigration status.

According to the agreement, the San Francisco clothing retailer will pay a civil penalty of $73,263 and two workers who were fired for their work due to its policies. It also has to provide wages back to those employees.

Gap’s 3-1/2 year-old investigation into the company was ended. The firm did not confess to wrongdoing, and stated that its actions were in compliance with a federal 1986 law prohibiting discrimination against immigrants.

Gap is accused of not necessary “reverifying the eligibility for employment” of lawful permanent residents, naturalized U.S citizens and of requiring certain documents from employees in order to verify their eligibility to work.

The Justice Department stated that Gap’s dependence on an online program for employment eligibility was a contributing factor to discriminatory conduct.

Gap did not immediately comment on the settlement.

Disclaimer: Fusion MediaThis website does not provide accurate and current data. CFDs are stocks, indexes or futures. The prices of Forex and CFDs are not supplied by exchanges. They are instead provided by market makers. As such, the prices might not reflect market values and could be incorrect. Fusion Media does not accept any liability for trade losses you may incur due to the use of these data.

Fusion MediaFusion Media and anyone associated with it will not assume any responsibility for losses or damages arising from the use of this information. This includes data including charts and buy/sell signal signals. You should be aware of all the potential risks and expenses associated with trading in the financial market. It is among the most dangerous investment types.

[ad_2]